
Moderators: Suggestions helpers, Developers
Maggy wrote:Jesus... It's way better now. Staff team just needs to keep an eye on the current supporters and remove those who are not capable of handling situations. About the clearance of any question, the supporter may reply, "I'll forward your question and come back when I'm 100 percent sure"; he then talks to an admin or discuss on forum/in-game. (For that, supporters chat and supporters section on forum is needed) - This will do good trust me. Showing it to public will make it even worst.That's what I keep saying
This one is simple and will work nicely.

xGTr wrote:i said that beforeI dislike Rally's suggestion because as e.e said the chat itself would get spammed and my other arguments which I'm too lazy to list them here (read all the replies). As for the "Supporter will get bored" shit; at anytime Supporters can ask A(SA)s to remove their rights if they don't wish to help anymore.
"Yes ,but most of them don't answer questions, what is the proplem if there is an admin did that steps when he don't got things to do :
1- Admin join the server with UC account
2- Admin use /ask and before he use /ask make sure that the player not AFK and staff can do that with the spector command what ever it is " /spector id " for example
3- Admin wait the answer and for sure he should ask a ez Q that anyone know it .
4-if the supporter replied " even after 15 min " then it will be fine unless he got a answer anyway
5- if the supporter didn't reply then the admin will join the day after it and do the same steps and see if the same supporter will not reply if he didn't reply again , then rights will be taken immediately .
or even admins don't need to do that , you can ask some of the players who are trusted to do this for you and record it or take SS if the supporter didn't reply in the first day and the second day ."
but i guess rally's suggest is good as well as his point is to let all the online players know the answer not just the player who used /ask so if someone got the same Q no need to use /ask again and again , cuase for sure the supporter will get bored at last .

Immortall2 wrote:Maybe you are right , but i can see a point in rally's suggest .xGTr wrote:i said that beforeI dislike Rally's suggestion because as e.e said the chat itself would get spammed and my other arguments which I'm too lazy to list them here (read all the replies). As for the "Supporter will get bored" shit; at anytime Supporters can ask A(SA)s to remove their rights if they don't wish to help anymore.
"Yes ,but most of them don't answer questions, what is the proplem if there is an admin did that steps when he don't got things to do :
1- Admin join the server with UC account
2- Admin use /ask and before he use /ask make sure that the player not AFK and staff can do that with the spector command what ever it is " /spector id " for example
3- Admin wait the answer and for sure he should ask a ez Q that anyone know it .
4-if the supporter replied " even after 15 min " then it will be fine unless he got a answer anyway
5- if the supporter didn't reply then the admin will join the day after it and do the same steps and see if the same supporter will not reply if he didn't reply again , then rights will be taken immediately .
or even admins don't need to do that , you can ask some of the players who are trusted to do this for you and record it or take SS if the supporter didn't reply in the first day and the second day ."
but i guess rally's suggest is good as well as his point is to let all the online players know the answer not just the player who used /ask so if someone got the same Q no need to use /ask again and again , cuase for sure the supporter will get bored at last .
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest