Aircrafts' passengers [ACCEPTED]

[Kurtiso]

Your name: [Lsrcr]Kurtiso
Suggestion headline: Add a new feature to get passengers into your aircraft in a better way.
Picture: Open the spoiler >>>

Spoiler: show

Importance of suggestion: 9/10
Why should it be accepted: Because, every time I try to show somebody something with a plane, I have to tell him where to stand exactly so he doesn't fall. I fly slowly all the time because I be scared of dropping him off. Adding this feature is kinda important to me and to other people I guess. It gives the passengers the chance to have a better view while sitting in the plane. As you can see in the picture, the passengers' names will be just like that and also the view. You can also add some commands like /invitetoplane (ID)", to make sure not everyone can get into your plane and have a view like this without getting an invitation from the pilot. And, /getin, this command is when you are close the plane, so you use it to get in. Also command /removepassenger (ID): if the player was already in the plane, this command ejects him, but if not, it just removes his invitation. And, one last thing. Players who have wanted level can't get into the plane, just to make sure nobody abuses it.

OR:
Instead of having too many commands. We may only add /getin, and it stays simple just like any other vehicle. /lock and /eject. If it's locked nobody can reach in, but that doesn't include the entrance to the aircrafts' interiors( Pressing G), only for /getin(Check the spoiler).

Notes:
1) The current planes' interiors do not have to be removed. We can have both, this new feature and the interior at the meanwhile. Because some players do some RP activities in the current planes' interiors.
2) This feature should only be added to the following aircrafts: Shamal, Nevada, AT400, Andromada, Levetian, Cargobob, and Raindance.
3) There is no limit to the number of passengers we can have in every aircraft. Just like a bus.

[jilla123]

Pretty good suggestion.
Why not?

[Fady]

This suggestion is needed, and I currently can't find any flaw in it as of yet

[Yuvi]

Indeed. +1

[Grand]

+1 Good suggestion.

[alber]

+1 Good suggestions

[AK33L]

+1 I agree completely with it

[Arthur]

good Suggestion
+1

[ackman]

ON-HOLD, Reason: Developers got pretty large work todo list before this one.

I'll update this topic once we get the final.

[ackman]

This is actually accepted but will take time to be implemented on the server.