
Moderators: Suggestions helpers, Developers
Milyn wrote:Simply put, in my opinion, the likelyhood of official group testers abusing the feature is a lot higher than factions. Nevertheless, official groups are mostly cophunt based, which means neither player is wanted until a duel, which can be conducted in a safe environment.Fantastic wrote:Your name: [Lsrcr]FantasticWhy only faction testers do group testers have no importance at all ??
Suggestion headline: Allow TOs and WOs to conduct faction tests in a virtual world.
Importance of suggestion: 7/10
Why should it be accepted: Testing applicants for both SWAT and Army has become a burden as testers cannot conduct faction tests without at least being interrupted (and thus delayed) more than once. The suggestion calls for testers to be able to conduct faction tests in a virtual environment in the absence of any potential disruptors. This way not only can tests become far more reliable and depict the true image of an applicant's skills due to the creation of an environment where maximum performance is encouraged, but they can also become far more time-efficient.
I am aware a similar suggestion has been previously denied over fears the feature would be abused but any abuse of the feature would probably be an isolated incident that would be dealt with accordingly. Also, people not trusted to use server features sensibly should not be appointed TOs/WOs in the first place.
Let me know what you think.
Having a virtual world for testers and applicants can cause a lot of problems if group testers have to go through disrupts faction testers/applicants must go through the same not everything should be easy
Muawwiz wrote:If group testers are also allowed to take tests in virtual world then I'm Positive because not only the tests of factions are interrupted by players, group tests are interrupted too. I remember I was taking shooting test of someone where swat came and dragged both of us , the tester and the applicant even after being told that it's a test.Just gonna use his statement as we expirienced the same.

Muawwiz wrote:If group testers are also allowed to take tests in virtual world then I'm Positive because not only the tests of factions are interrupted by players, group tests are interrupted too. I remember I was taking shooting test of someone where swat came and dragged both of us , the tester and the applicant even after being told that it's a test.



Muawwiz wrote:If group testers are also allowed to take tests in virtual world then I'm Positive because not only the tests of factions are interrupted by players, group tests are interrupted too. I remember I was taking shooting test of someone where swat came and dragged both of us , the tester and the applicant even after being told that it's a test.Factions uphold far higher standards for their staff than groups. Yours might not abuse it, but other groups (we all know which ones) have staff members with a history of rule violations.
Muawwiz wrote:If group testers are also allowed to take tests in virtual world then I'm Positive because not only the tests of factions are interrupted by players, group tests are interrupted too. I remember I was taking shooting test of someone where swat came and dragged both of us , the tester and the applicant even after being told that it's a test.Unfair if it just for factions , If this gona be accepted , make sure it for official groups to because all are just same.
Slam wrote: Unfair if it just for factions , If this gona be accepted , make sure it for official groups to because all are just same.Doesn't make it unfair because most of the group staff aren't even that experienced and as Robin stated earlier, most of the official group staff have a history of breaking rules. You can't trust someone with the power they shouldn't possess. Faction staff are constantly under the supervision of the Supreme command because factions are a part of the server, that's not the case with groups. Group staff are supervised by their respective owners/leaders and they might break the rules too, who knows?


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest